Women take power[↻70%]
There are too many women in power and in power. More and more women entrepreneurs, women administrators, women, something and someone guiding, at last, even just some causeless and aimless women. It is a sign of the decline of civilization, wrote in his column for the magazine "Russian pioneer" the main intellectual postmodernist of the Kremlin, Vladislav Surkov. But men do not sit idly by, he notices. Somewhere out there, behind the ruins of a world cut by women, they're forging a new world.
At the very beginning of the zero Boris Grebenshchikov said that the Age of Aquarius had come, and therefore the restoration of matriarchy is inevitable.
Do we need to take into account, in political planning, the opinion of a non-political scientist, not a sociologist or an economist, but a mage, a doctor of occult sciences and a visionary, which is Boris? I'm sure, yes. Who doubts, look at the west - matriarchy, indeed, comes. Women take power.
Heads of government, ministers, mayors in very influential countries are increasingly women. More and more women entrepreneurs, women administrators, women, something and somebody guiding, finally, even just some kind of forceless and aimlessly punchy women.
Hollywood serials and blockbusters, to which the priestly competences are gradually transferred, and with them the responsibility to maintain new hierarchies, belittle men and raise women. Among the characters are less common chiefs, but the bosses at every turn. Fighting men look wild and limited, their stupid energy is wisely directed by self-confident women and grandmothers, who head the police departments, special forces, and even entire special services. In the last episode of "Star Wars," the last Jedi is naturally a girl.
The campaign launched in the West against the male persecution of women is obviously only the beginning. The next stage will be the demand of women to exchange roles - "now we will stick!" Should someone take the initiative, sex, it seems, no one canceled. Better so, than in any way.
Thinly sensitive conjuncture # British scientists, as always, did not disappoint. A serious geneticist from the University of Kent at the beginning of the year published an article in which he proved that the "male" Y chromosome containing the SRY gene (the program for reproducing the sexual characteristics of a male human) should disappear in the course of evolution. And a set of genes "responsible" for the birth of boys will fall out of the genome. In fact, it is a delicate, with the use of sparing intellectual terminology, the declaration of all of us, individuals of a "strong" sex, - degenerates.
What's happening? What actually happens? Once upon a time, James Brown sang (and the girls sang along with him!): This is a man's world. And most recently 50 Cent sang the same thing.
This world, indeed, is the invention and product of a man. Imperfect, but what is there. Moses and Gautama, Shakespeare and Nabokov, Newton and Mandelbro, Saladin and Zhukov, Korolev and Oppenheimer, Zvorykin and Jobs, the Beatles and Bryn ... co-authors of everything around us and in us. Why is this male male world taken away by women? And most importantly, why?