Legal Transactions With Bitcoin And Steemit

phenomena bitcoin this has encroach to in circle community aceh, even has become passive income for some of community aceh. so that where not immediately sought solution aspect its law, then worried about appear feeling previously-previously by some of community. moreover again many question that appear to writer, especially around law interact with bitcoin about halal or keharamannya. quoted from home page wikipedia, bitcoin is one currencies electronics that made at 2009 by satoshi nakamoto. name such also associated with software source open that he design, and also use network peer-to-peer without storage centralized or administrator single, under which department financial united states mention bitcoin a currencies that terdesentralisasi. not like currencies at large, bitcoin not dependent with believe publisher main. bitcoin use a database that distributed and spread to node-node from a network p2p to journal transaction, and use cryptography to provide function-function security base, like ensure that bitcoin-bitcoin only can spent by everybody's own it, and not may done more than one time. design from bitcoin allow for ownership without identity (anonymous) and transfer wealth. bitcoin-bitcoin can stored in personal computer in a format file wallet or in store by a service wallet third parties. irrespective of all that, bitcoin-bitcoin can sent through internet to whoever that have a address bitcoin. topology peer-to-peer bitcoin and lack of administration single make it mightn't for authority government aught, for manipulate score from bitcoin-bitcoin or cause inflation with produce more numerous bitcoin. its law forbidden how law use or transact with beitcoin? holder trustworthy fatwa darul ifta 'misriyyah, kairo, mesir, after do discussion and refer to expert economy about currencies, release fatwa that transact with currencies virtual, especially bitcoin its law forbidden. prohibition such based by some reason: first, has impact negative for system economy; second, disruption balance market (place implementation transaction between seller and buyer); third, disruption concept and regulation ordinances work some activists economy; fourth, nonexistent umbrella law against user or everybody's interact with bitcoin, also against money that produced thereof; fifth, not yet is regulation government about law interact with bitcoin (be allowed or forbidden); sixth, tercabutnya authority government in thing financial with applicable at bitcoin; seventh, existing kemudharatan that appear from fraud, kesamaran and fraud at use, default and price. messenger of allah peace be upon him in hadith prohibit action fraud, "item anybody's deceive congregation muslim, then he excludes into category congregation islam". furthermore interact with bitcoin can risk high against individual and country, while rule sharia has determine "not may memudharatkan anybody else and not may inter memudharatkan". meantime, tgk h muhammad amen daud (father cot trueng) think that transaction (ber-muamalah) that be allowed by religion is transaction apparent's' aqid-its (seller and buyer), existing mabi' (item), and existing benefit that aimed from to her. while at case transact with bitcoin not diperdapatkan buyer by clear (anonymous), item that merchantability (mabi ') neither owned by real. thereby, he think that forbidden its law interact with bitcoin. opinion's he pointed at event mubahasah bahtsul hadisah in one foster mother in town langsa. opinion similar also communicated by tgk h nuruzzahri samalanga (waled nahdatul ulama). according to he, forbidden its law transact with bitcoin, because not accordance with rule-rule ber-muamalah as that arranged by syara'. so that he suggest to all community so that find sustenance with active and in way-way that lawful and clear source. sustenance that produced with way-way that lawful, according to waled nahdatul ulama, is belief and blessing the granted direct allah swt. sustenance that well is sustenance that lawful and obtained with way try, not produced with way instant that infringe with commonsense. not tool payment relevant currencies virtual such, bank indonesia (bank of indonesia) state that bitcoin not is currencies or tool payment that valid in indonesia based on law no.7 year 2011 about currencies. moreover, bank of indonesia also prohibit organizer service system payment to perform processing transaction payment with use virtual currency (included bitcoin). bank of indonesia in one news release-its relevant bitcoin and virtual currency other state: pay attention to law no.7 year 2011 about currencies and law no.23 year 1999 that then changed several times, last with law no.6 year 2009, bank of indonesia state that bitcoin and virtual currency other not is currencies or tool payment that valid in indonesia. by consequently, community encouraged for has a heart-heart against bitcoin and virtual currency other. all risk relevant ownership / usage bitcoin borne self by owner / user bitcoin and virtual currency other. from some description above, like institution fatwa mesir, opinion some cleric, and statement from bank of indonesia, will we still menyakini that bitcoin that lawful? so too when we interact with various media social that can produce reward in shape virtual, for example steemit are using facility bitcoin for processing cashing out reward or funds. of course aspect law about steemit need assessment that more profound again from mavens in field.