You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: There Is No Middle Ground On Transgender Rights

in #informationwar6 years ago

It's not the definition of any word, it's the context of what you said.
But by pretending your not being hateful, then accusing her of just feeling oppressed you are making her point for her.
..and also backing up the original point of the post we are all commenting on.

Sort:  

The context fits... When sexual operations occur, mutilation of the genitals is involved, in some form or another. Be upset about the word but it's a factual statement and it's disingenuous to feel offended for saying a word that, by definition, fits the narrative perfectly.

Her point is foolish and you and I know it. Every little thing is oppressive to you all, it's a joke to even be conversing about this when every little thing gets misconstrued by an emotional transgender who thinks smearing people will make them support her cause.

The way she responds to the issue shows she isn't really genuine... No, she's just passionately ignorant and naive.

That is absurd.
To claim her argument is the disingenuous and hateful one is absurd.

ab·surd
/əbˈsərd,əbˈzərd/
adjective
adjective: absurd; comparative adjective: absurder; superlative adjective: absurdest
wildly unreasonable, illogical, or inappropriate.
Example: "the allegations are patently absurd"

I never said her statement was hateful. I said it was disingenuous.

I didn't say "Statement" I said "argument".

Don't mix in your feelings and act as if they're what I've stated.

I didn't say "feelings" I said "argument".

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.081
BTC 62954.95
ETH 1711.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.40