Am I an Anarchist?

in #anarchy10 years ago


I secretly want to be, but I don't know enough about this anarchy stuff to fully consider myself one. Here begins my journey of researching the modern day anarchist, and anarchy, in aid to help other clueless humans like myself :)
Joining the Steemit community, I saw a lot of posts with topics about anarchy, and people who are anarchists and I hadn't really heard the terms until recently. So I started to refresh my brain on government systems, and the more I read about anarchists, the more I identified with them, but on a much milder scale.

This is my first look into myself as an anarchist, so I could be completely understanding everything wrong, so please give me feedback, or advice, or point me in a more educated direction!

From my understanding and what I'm learning, an anarchy is based on the self, and against traditional forms of government (i.e. the state). Anarchy is "Law and freedom without force" according to Immanuel Kant.

Then I see another definition of anarchy, as "A situation of confusion, and wild behavior in which the people in a country, group, organization, etc. are not controlled by rules or laws." So now I'm thinking anarchy is wild and confusing? People who consider themselves anarchists seem independent, logical, and happy from what I'm seeing... Who created this definition?

I continue reading and come across Donald Rooum's What is Anarchism? An Introduction. Rooum states "But it would be a mistake to think of anarchism as essentially negative. The opposition to government arises out of a belief about society which is positive." And suddenly, my short-lived pessimistic view on anarchy and anarchists disappears. I love when he also says "Anarchists believe that the point of society is to widen the choices of individuals." I totally agree and would say that most of my ideals are in line with an anarchists view on how society should run. Each individual is just that: individual. Each human possesses unique opinions and talents, offering different values to society, one not being higher than the other.

So then comes the question of okay, so anarchists don't believe in centralized governments, which means they probably don't have corporate/capitalist jobs...so what do anarchists do? Answer: "what distinguishes anarchists from the rest of society is our emphasis on direct action to achieve our goals." YES YES YES!!! I get that. I understand. That is me. I took direct action (see my From Corporate to Paradise post) to achieve some of my goals. My goal was to move to Maui, work for a non-profit, and talk about conserving our oceans while also working on conservation projects on the side. I said good-bye 9-5, and hello to writing my own story. Though I am still owned by the government and getting taxed heavily for social security, health insurance, and dental insurance, and then paying for everything else on my own which is also taxed, I feel like I'm on the road to being my own boss and not be governed by someone else. In time, that will come. I also love what else this website said... "You'll find that anarchists are a lot like you -- everyday working people, almost uniformly poor." I am very poor and still chained to paying off student loans for a while. I got sucked into the capitalist game where it's impossible for my mom to pay for both my sister and I to go to a 4 year university without taking out loans. Yes yes I know you are thinking, why then go to a 4 year university? Well, at the time, that's all I thought I was supposed to do. Go to college, get a degree, find a job....but now I'm broadening my horizons, opening my mind to things like Steemit, anarchy, and just saying FUCK THE SYSTEM to begin my road of being an anarchist. Not because it's a cool fad, but because I'm starting to identify more and more with these people.

Am I an Anarchist? To some degree YES. I think all of us posses a little bit of anarchy!

Sort:  

I see anarchy very simply. Literally, it means "without rulers"
Anarchy asserts that you own yourself. That no one can legitimately claim "rule" over your person; your body. And likewise you cannot claim rule over anyone else. This is essentially a claim of natural property rights.

And that's about it.

Everything else you might attribute to anarchism emanates from this basic premise of self ownership.

Just about anything you can imagine can emerge within this framework. From local charitable non-profits to exploration of the moon, or global services. There's no limit to voluntary action; no limit to voluntary cooperation.

I think most people would agree that they own themselves, and that they don't own other people. This I would say makes everyone an anarchist, even if they don't know it yet. The trouble is that, while they agree with the above, they also assert and do things that contradict this.

Not owning other people means I can't use force to do with them as I wish. I can't strike them, harm them, kidnap, or murder them. I can't steal their money or damage their property. Basically I can't do anything to them that they do not voluntarily consent to.

Notions such as Voluntaryism and The Non-Agression Principle often accompany anarchism as they are essentially expression of the same basic principle.

I would echo brindleswan's suggestion of Larken Rose and Adam Kokesh as a good source of easily digestible entertaining material.

Awesome, I love replies like yours. Very insightful for me as this is a whole new realm that I've never explored. Thank you so much for your reply and suggestions!

Nice post. Adam Kokesh has a short book available for free in several formats including an audio version that takes 3 hours to listen to.
thefreedomline.com
Also, Larken Rose's book The Most Dangerous Superstition is great, as are all his great videos on youtube.

Both of them are now here at Steemit!

Awesome thank you @brindleswan. I will definitely be looking into those!

Love it. Maui is beautiful! I'm exploring Anarchy myself. I identify with much of it. Thanks for the post.

Glad you enjoyed @iamron , we're all in this together!

the most useful realization i have had is that , natural rights, come from natural law, comes from natural philosophy. natural philosophy is what physics used to be called. if you understand the logic of the dynamics of nature, you will understand what is called here, autonomy (self rule) which comes after anarchy (no ruler) is a fact. this is the way that things function amongst free people in nature. statism, or any dynamic of control between free people. cannot happen continually because that is contrary to the dynamic of nature. a person that directs their actions toward control, may succeed for a time in their goals, but they are working against the natural flow of things and cannot in the long run maintain that control. it is as a language constructed so that untruth is grammatically incorrect. it can still be spoken, but with fluency the lie is apparent and cannot be seen otherwise. like math in physics, if someone enters an error into the equation, to control the outcome, it is only a matter of time until someone else, learned in math finds the error and corrects it. our rights derive from our existence, our origin in the natural world. that is, natural rights, not human rights, not constitutional rights, these others are sophistries designed for subjugation. i hope any of this makes sense. this is the first i've put it to print. if anyone here finds flaws in my logic, please feel free to reply.

Many people view anarchy like the second definition you mentioned in your post. I believe this view is derived from the scenes of so called "anarchy" we see on television. I believe those creating chaos and destroying the personal property of others as an exercise in anarchy are not truly anarchists at all. These individuals are exercising the power of brute strength over their fellow-man. Are these individuals not oppressing their fellow-man by destroying personal property without voluntary consent? Bakunin said it best"Do you want to make it impossible for anyone to oppress his fellow-man? Then make sure that no one shall possess power". As an Anarchist, one must remember to exercise their personal power over others through free association. Don't be oppressive like the very government(s) you are trying not be under. Isn't Anarchy supposed to equal freedom through voluntary association?

but now I'm broadening my horizons, opening my mind to things like Steemit, anarchy, and just saying FUCK THE SYSTEM to begin my road of being an anarchist

Yes, you are an anarchist. hehe.

Maybe you should come join me at Steemtopia?! :P

Doesn't seem like a bad place!! @darknet

Your ideals are directly in line with mine, anddd I think you are beautiful. ;-)

Come to Aus :P

I especially like this post of yours.

Nice to have you on board. Upvoted and followed.

Hi @jilwirt, me again :)

I thought you may like to know about our project:
http://steemit.com/steemit/@darknet/steemtopia-an-update-from-optimistic

I would love for you to join us :)

Kind regards,
Optimistic

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.076
BTC 64289.99
ETH 1665.81
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.41