Science is Simply a Lie
The reason I question science, is that science is no longer a matter of conducting experiments and generating an outcome, but a matter of having faith in a book of information that someone else has given us, similar to religious texts.
If you were taught from a young age that 2+2=5, you would believe that 2+2=5. However, if someone actually came along with the truth and told you that 2+2 is really equal to 4, you would argue to the death that 2+2=5.
Our brains are programmed just as the processor in your PC. Even if you were to ask your PC a question, it will only give you an answer back that has been programmed into the memory of it.
Thus, we realize today that there is more information that you can be programmed with that defies logic but supports science as you're taught. As an example, going from planet earth to the moon, is said to be a 'scientific fact', however while looking at the facts, you'll see clearly, it's impossible to get through the van Allen radiation belts that are situated between the earth and the moon, as NASA scientist Don
Pettit states, 'We don't have the technology to go to the moon anymore'. And as Neil DeGrasse Tyson, even he makes the mistake in stating that the world is oblate (like a pear) rather than the perfectly round globe we see today in images provided by NASA (admittedly CGI) by NASA's graphic designer, Robert Simmons.
We can have a perfect picture of Saturn, Mars, and Jupiter, why do we not have a clear composited photograph of our own planet today as an oblate object? This is just where you can start to have a seed planted in you that will perhaps grow, and have you question mainstream science. The technology you have at your fingertips today, will not only have you explore the simple question 'Did we go to the moon?' It will teach yourself to always question everything, including the science you've been taught.
The most important thing, is to just keep asking the right questions.
It is interesting to note how deeply involved the Vatican, along with other major religious "outlets", is with its money when it comes to "scientific" research. Seems to me they are making a new religion and using science as the basis for the principals of this new religion. It is heavily steeped in "It is in your DNA, so you can't do anything about it". Genetics is the new "Original Sin". Thanks for sharing this, it is important stuff for all of us to be on the lookout for this day and age. <3
Very smart my friend.
It can be a seemingly lonely asset at times, but well worth it. Thanks for not being a zombie.
Of course, this doesn't mean all science is a lie, at least not the stuff we can prove to ourselves everyday. Example: Melting point of a substance. <3
The earth is indeed flatten but by a too small amount to be seen by the naked eye on a picture.
Because Earth is rather large and you have to go rather far out to capture Earth in one picture. The moon landing was the only time humans made it that far out.
And the only cameras far enough out the make pictures of earth are the probes we send Saturn, Mars, and Jupiter. On there way out that is. So only if we send out new probes we get new up to date pictures of Earth as well.
Which you clearly don't do.
Congratulations @incognito1! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
No, it isn't. You're using that image to deceptively drive the point that we're somehow being "lied" to. It makes you appear as a Flat Earth proponent — don't do that. The reason why the two Earths look as different as they do is because they're edited and digitized, but that doesn't make them fake. Your phone has a digital camera, and you can edit photos on it, but that doesn't make them any less real than a photo taken with an optical camera. NASA did this because they wanted to show how the Earth appears with more or less clouds; the second Earth especially had less clouds to show more of the oceans.
Science hasn't changed at all. It is still about making hypotheses, predictions, theorizing, testing experiments, and seeing if these hypotheses are true. Faith has nothing to do with what modern Science is teaching us, and trying to equate scientific textbooks to the Bible (which has been disproven ad infinitum because of Science) is just asinine. Science isn't a religion, and it has never been one. There is no book that scientists have faith in because Science requires that faith should be excluded entirely. You have no idea how Science works.
We did went to the Moon. It's a scientific fact. No, it isn't impossible to get pass through the Van Allen Radiation Belts because you have to be in the belts for an extended period of time in order to suffer any substantial effects. Do you even know how to research? Quote-mining isn't proof of anything. Don Pettit said we don't have the technology to go back to the Moon, but that doesn't mean we can't recreate that technology, it's just much, much more expensive than it was 50 years ago. There's no reason for a 7th Moon landing.
Neil Degrasse Tyson didn't make a mistake when he said the Earth is oblate. NASA isn't educating that Earth is "perfectly-round". The Earth only looks "perfectly-round" because its origin of flattening is so small that it's negligible. Scientists once thought it was a perfect sphere, as well, before we had the ability to properly model the Earth's shape. Also, there are thousands upon thousands of images of our planet. It's quite foolish to think that every single one of them is Photoshopped or CGI.
You're asking why we have "perfect" images of the other planets, but not Earth? NONE of them are perfectly-round, and there is no such thing as a perfect image. A planet's oblateness isn't noticeable; why can't you comprehend this very simple observation? Jesus Christ...
All of your questions and concerns could have been easily answered by a simple Google search. And conspiracy theories should at least be viewed with strong skepticism. Much of them are conjured up by people who have no prior knowledge to the so-called "lies" and "secrets" they're trying to "expose".