IPS, Tim or whatever you go by now, there are serious problems with this video and it is certainly not a globe debunk. The most obvious is that the presenter assumes the hidden or obscured value from the curve calculator should match with the sagitta or (h) of his own calculations. They are not the same thing. Other curve calculators like metabunk show the sagitta as "bulge". For this scenario the bulge works out to 188 ft, exactly what his math showed. At least he did that math right, but towards the end of the video he completely loses me with absurd reasoning based on his first big mistake.

The text here confirms a complete misrepresentation of the globe model by the author. I can go into detail but I shouldn't have to and don't have the time. The first glober that watches this will be all over it explaining the flaws in detail and probably use it to continue making flat earthers look like they 'just don't understand' the globe model.

This video only has 9 views on Youtube as of now and the channel has no subscribers. I'll politely let him know where I think he is wrong and hope that he sees it and deletes or updates the video before the flat Earth bandwagon catches wind.