Greetings community Stemit, with this main photography I create a new post: portrait made with acrylic, on newspaper, made in 2015. Two versions of an artistic work.

     Analytical variant: understood journalistic graffiti as an object of mass manipulation. And the photographic collage is for the dimensions offered by these spaces and technologies (or new devices). Photographic collage in a figurative sense. The creator ends up exhibiting an idea less and less precise in relation to how he thought, felt or visualized it. First there is the problem of bringing those ideas to the tangible physical world or material part: the reductive framing that the canvas allows between its limits, in this case. After the conception of the work, which is only a weak reflection of the mental image and that will never meet the exact criteria to be the dreamed desire, the intention, the end or the "intended" destiny, for obviously natural reasons, original or ontological: the idea is always the idea (that sometimes, in itself is inconsistent, vague and even flaccid) and the result in its configuration as a work of art is something else: a criterion or sums of criteria, according to who contemplates and "recreate" the intellective moment. I conceive it as if each time a new sale was opened, which is the vestige of the first or previous image. Then there is the subject of the photo, which is another version of the picture inherent in the work of art, however, between the photo and the contemplative exercise are these digital screens. I end up thinking about an infinite theatrical work, where the protagonist role of its actors is usurped, for placing a humanized example.