RE: WE'VE A PROBLEM AND WE NEED YOUR HELP: upvoting always with 100% voting power - how to achieve that?
You have a misunderstanding of efficient use of VP, @crypto.piotr. Voting does two things:
- Rewards the author of the post you vote for
- Grows your sp
Common STEEM wisdom tells you to vote the equivalent of 10 - 100% votes each day for best results. This is what I did for a long time.
Then I found out that voting more often would give better results. It turns out that voting down to around 75% sp gives better curation rewards, and spreads my vote to more people.
I think you are down in the weeds here. The best advice I can give is to have your people post more, interact more, and become more of a part of the STEEM community. Just vote their posts, (and other posts that interest you) and maybe do weekly curation posts to spotlight the best of what you've got.
Worrying about whether or not people get $1.50 or $1.30 from your vote is not a good use of effort in my opinion. Spending time to broaden your base of interested parties would be more effective.
Plus we have down-voting gangs now. I cannot speak for them, but using one big account to only vote a few people at 100% vp might draw attention you do not want. What you describe seems close to the idea of circle-jerking and they are currently down-voting others who take this path.
I suggest joining the curation league of @abh12345 with this account and see if you can get into the top ranks there. At least spend some time seeing what effective curators do. It is definitely not similar to your current idea.
I agree with you, @fitinfun. Your advice is quite wise given the current downvoting war
Regards esteemed friend @fitinfun.
This words are full of wisdom and I am sure they are the product of experience.
As you say, this may not be the most efficient use for the current SP. The efficiency to which you refer is related to the levels of SP return by curation. It is necessary to maximize these levels in order to grant ROI to delegators.
I believe that receiving a valuable vote encourages content creators. Then, playing with 80% - 100% would allow to grant 5 - 6 votes of similar value from time to time (we would have to calculate the rate of recovery of the VP) instead of just one vote at 100%.
We would have to redefine the lines of action.
I consider that @project.hope spends a lot of hours in trying to cordialize and interact with its fan base.
Thank you for this valuable comment.
Your friend, Juan