Hi @quantumdeveloper
Thanks for the question. It has opened up some thought channels for me. My article was based on my intention to describing some of the thoughts on the Gleissberg Cycle which a few people are expressing.

Much as post Newtonians described the world using his concept of the laws of the universe and a bunch of mystic forces (which is probably quantum mechanics), I am struggling with making sense of information which I don't have the education to understand.

My understanding is that fusion of elements around the isotopes of iron or nickel have a net release of energy but heavier elements require the energy found in a supernova to be created. Under normal conditions a sun would only work on hydrogen/helium but what about in areas with intense gravimetric or magnetic forces. Could localized magnetic conditions in sunspots or coronal holes be sufficient to create isotopes higher than helium.

The sun is continually being showered with dust and debris. What happens to those elements in the face of solar plasma? Is it possible that some of these particles will pick up spare electrons sufficient to change their state?

There are a number of stars described as variable stars. It is possible that all stars are variable - just differing in extent. This isn't a firm opinion, just that I am creating a conjecture. What if our sun isn't in a constant state of energy production but flickers like an AC light bulb. Periodically Sol might experience micronova. The various solar cycles point toward this.
This video talks about the possibility that this is the case.