Arguments of a legal ethical medical nature is one

"
Arguments of a legal ethical medical nature is one of the most common discussions we can see on that so Shel on TV round this huge amount of texts written discussed discussion beautifully for use in Canada for and against euthanasia Well and less often argue about suicide how much suicide is a noetic acceptable solution of any, then difficult life circumstances do not know something categorically against various kinds of suicidal actions that I will not now all these arguments to learn I just want to draw attention to e that behind this are different interpretations of death different thanatological concepts of philosophical ontology philosophical doctrine of unconscious concepts in most cases people argue about some small things but in fact there is a difference in the fundamental basic and what kind of difference is the first difference is religious and secular Within the framework of the resurrection the interpretation of Death is a natural event and we treat it as something that is closely within the framework of the religious interpretation of Death is a sacred event transitioning into a genuine present with The process is so important that we in no way at all should not interfere in this matter. But this one let God decide Angels fate is still some forces, not mine and the second here is such a point is the divergence of liberals and conservatives and liberals the right to die is this the natural manifestation of human freedom is another cranial Freedom for which the liberals will fight indeed if we consider it as an important part of life or the continuation of life, then we must provide not only Freedom in relation to life but also Freedom in respect of death and the conservative position of which you are generally suspicious about the weather on this freedom is particularly suspicious because conservatism is often closely associated with religiosity here the right to death is seen as such a not-so-dangerous request for intervention in the natural