Self-voting campaign and the research

When evangelist come to your door spreading their gospel, be wise and fish out their agenda. When people present data that they claim was thoroughly research, it is important to look at their sample size and the parameters that were used. Research is good but when mix with agenda and biases it nullifies their findings. Science has progress because we continue to ask questions. Those before and among us have made it their job to carry out the necessary research to answer some of these questions. We all can participate in this quest for knowledge, it can be every day questions that has evaded answers or questions that capture your attention. You never know where the answers you may find may lead you or the world. One of the main problems facing research are biases and agendas. There are many on this list which are often noted in the limitation section of any paper. That's why it is important to peer-review any scientific paper before it gets in the public domain. It gives your colleagues the opportunities to critique your work and the necessary changes can be made. What you think, may be words of sound wisdom may be ticking time bomb awaiting bandwagonist who run with the data that fits their agenda. I say this to say, be careful how your present data on this platform especially when you tag people's name with it.

Let me get to the point, I did not make Part 1 or 2 but you conveniently include me in part 3, you went as far as creating a pseudo account call steemabuse and use 100% voting as your algo parameter. If you aren't aware I vote at 100% because my vote is worth less than 5 cents. I realized just after HF19 that all of my post and comments were automatically upvoted which I have since removed. I told you before, your agenda is ill-conceived and actually causing more harm than good, you decide to include me in part 3 of your self-voting campaign. That 5.41 cents of which 2.81 were pay back to me were over a 2 months since I have been on Steemit. In fact, you can check out my steemd.com/@daudimitch and follow my voting and see if I go about this upvoting abuse as you call it. I see you have successful galvanize those with agenda's to go about attacking others and I assume, though I am subject to correction your alias new account steemabuse is creating quite a stir among newbies. I am thankful that folks with serious SP have brought two of your ticking time bomb to negative rep. I am not here for a war, nor am I taking any payment for this, when you present data without carefully looking at it, people run with it and whatever grudge they have with someone, they use this against them. Money is tool, a tool that few understand how to use, please be careful with your research. We have strong anarcho-capitalist beliefs, your financial nose-diving into people finances is the biggest problem we face with the government today. Let the code and the free market determine what someones earns.

I ask of you again, if you want to present your data, use table with estimates, please don't tag people's name, because you would just fuel others who have agendas and personal grudges to attack others. Eventually, money the tool always goes where it is used best. If you have nothing to do with steemabuse account and its just coincidence, then I apologize, if its you, then the tool is actually using you. @calamus056