RE: Response to @transisto's Open Letter
I think people have a hard time wrapping their head around the fact that technical analysis is a game of probabilities and scenarios that may be more likely to occur than another scenario. As market conditions change, so too can the odds of a previously identified pattern or movement.
I'm NOT a TA guy, but have learned quite a bit from your posts, and more so from your video analysis.
I find it absurd that people want to downvote content just because they don't like it on a platform whose purpose was suppose to hold the door open to free flowing speech and information. If the community didn't value it, it wouldn't be read, upvoted, resteemed, etc. Or better yet, if they produced more/better content then it would eventually outshine that which they attack.
I appreciate your efforts and knowledge, however imperfect it may be. I see genuine and sincere attempts to help people, and hope you continue to find an outlet for your voice.
Thanks.
Impossible, it's the upvote from one of the 10 largest accounts that gives him support and views. Nobody can outshine that unless they have 4 million dollars to spend powering up like haejin's constant upvote @ranchorelaxo who gives him 200$ per post, that ends up being closer to 500$ a post since SBD price is inflated, 10 times a day.. can't outshine that. But as a community who cares, we can remove some of the money that haejin would otherwise take, so it can go to other good posters who don't get noticed as much.
That's because Steem is an unfair system. Only the rich survive in this game. I wrote an article about it in hopes to shed light on the major flaw. If Steem changed it's calculation for upvote count Haejin would still be on top because of his subsriber base and upvotes.
https://busy.org/@guntotnhippie/haejin-berniesanders-and-randomwhale-oh-my-a-steem-failure