The myth of quality content

chrisaiki (63)in #snax • 6 years ago

Some people claim that you have to write quality posts and quality posts only on Steem. They are afraid of the thieves of the reward pool.
In my opinion, if you want to read quality content, read the classic authors: Victor Hugo, Shakespeare, Osho, Krisnamurti, Deepack Chopra and thousands of recognized authors whose books are available online in all major libraries now digitized .

Do not read posts on Steem!

What is the Steemians looking for? Social interactions, I want to know if what I think interests you. Most of the time the answer is no, but when one or two participants deign to make a quality response to my dark post, I am very happy. If in addition I can win some Steem and fabulate on his improbable evolution, everything is for the best.

The whales strengthen their positions by voting mainly for their friends, we can not say they steal the reward pool because it is thanks to them that it exists!
But we have understood that the inequalities are accentuated, on Steem as in real life.

SNAX has made considerable efforts to estimate the value of social interactions. Specialists will judge for themselves the quality of the mathematical model. The reality will show if there is a real improvement or if the model has unknown biases.

But for the moment, I am a regularly paid SNAX author who becomes an indispensable complement to my reward in Steem. I won more SNAX in 12 days than Steem in 2 years !! Obviously it does not mean anything and I warned you, do not expect to find quality content on Steem.

This post is my participation to @dragosroua's contest to promote SNAX, this new token to reward all social interactions regardless of the network you prefer and on which you have laboriously accumulated hundreds of friends.