Steem experiment: Burn post #339
Burn post for June 16. Rules and update
To provide additional support, vote for the @burnpost comment(s) below.
To view proof of burn transactions, visit https://steemd.com/@burnpost
Burn post for June 16. Rules and update
To provide additional support, vote for the @burnpost comment(s) below.
To view proof of burn transactions, visit https://steemd.com/@burnpost
Rewards from this comment #1 will be added to the post rewards for burning
Rewards from this comment #2 will be added to the post rewards for burning
Rewards from this comment #3 will be added to the post rewards for burning
Rewards from this comment #4 will be added to the post rewards for burning
Question:
Since @steempeak has the burn option, should @burnpost use that instead of "proving" the burn?
The @burnpost method does better for stakeholders if and when payouts are in SBD and SBD is overvalued. Other than that using direct burn is fine, and I might start using it. BTW, steemit.com can do that now too, by setting 100% beneficiary to @null under the advanced options.
That makes sense. Thanks for the reply!