You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Diary Game: Preparing Fish Pepper Soup For My Entire Teammates And Officials (08-09-2025)
And please let me correct you... There aren't my hints. These hints are standards to writing a good diary game post which were generally accepted as hints to writing a quality post. A Steemit representative gave these hints years back. I'm only trying to bring it back to life for the sake of newcomers.
Standards? Who should have the right to set “standards” on a decentralized platform? Generally accepted?? Certainly not! No one who can truly write agrees with this drama. They only want one thing: to write.
I understand you perfectly. But when there's a reward attached to writing, it becomes something else. Why? Because there are expectations. If we should just write because the platform is all about writing, no one votes and no one comments m, how would users feel? Why is there a standard for assessing quality posts? Why can't a 100 words or 150 words be taken as a quality post? Why don't everyone who writes get votes if the platform is all about writing?
Difference abi? And that's when the difference comes in assessing quality posts. If 20 people are to write a formal letter to the president of United states and 18 choose to write the way they feel but are creativity with body of the letter. They ignore the two addresses and title of the letter because they want to be different. They don't want to follow standards placed on letter writing. How would the president feel about these 18? They are disregarding him? Who do they think I am for them to write a letter casually to me? I know this platform is decentralised but in a situation whereby we're getting rewards from someone, we must do what it takes to earn this reward.
It's just like engagement challenges. There are standards you must follow when writing these posts in order to be be selected as a winner or get votes from SC02. Why don't we just write anyhow since the platform is basically about writing?
We don't care of our readers benefit from our posts or not. All we do is write for ourselves. Anyways, you've made good points in your argument. Let's not drag this further. I've heard your own viewpoint in being free with contents.