The criminal directive "Barbarossa"

Neo-Nazism exists in all European countries, in various degrees. In Iran, in many Arab and Latin American states, the activities of Hitler (Schicklgruber) were never considered criminal. The maximum expressed light rebuke ... for insufficient zeal to destroy Jews, for example. But this is far from us, I will return to my native aspen. In my opinion, in neo-Nazism in the expanses of the former USSR, true ideological convictions should be separated from the reaction of the psyche to excessive propaganda.

In countless films and books "about the war," the Germans were portrayed as stupid sadists. And our noble sacrificial knights in tunic. And the farther from the Great Patriotic War, the works of directors and writers became more naive, far-fetched and official. Hence the reaction of the normal person to the obvious bias and fiction of the official propaganda stamps. But the USSR and its stupid propaganda have not existed for a quarter of a century. And now I have the impression that the society is deliberately filed a picture that promises and exalts the Wehrmacht. Therefore, I studied this topic and made conclusions, which I publish. I emphasize that in this article: 1. I only talk about the Wehrmacht! Neither the Kriegsmarine (Navy), nor the Luftwaffe (Air Force), nor the SS and the troops in front of them. Only the Wehrmacht, only the land forces of Germany. 2. Speech is only about those two reasons that corrupted the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front. that is, at the theater of military operations (theater of operations) against the USSR. Crimes against civilians in European countries were committed by 99% of soldiers who arrived from the Eastern Front.

These Germans were corrupted by Barbarossa and stay on the Eastern Front. They simply forgot about the military courts. And so they killed, robbed and raped in Europe in the same way as they had become accustomed to doing so with impunity in the occupied part of the USSR. 3. I do not speak about the criminal ideology of the Third Reich here. About this ideology and without me from each iron has already been told and much has been distorted. In addition, the average soldier-criminal is not guided by ideology at all, no matter how the opposite political figures, writers, "pillars of law" and, in general, respected respected theorists and scholars of the humanities, prove to us. 4. There are no doubts about the facts of numerous and mass crimes of the German army against the peaceful population of the USSR. If it is interesting for Eastfaca, I will write some articles in the context of the topic and the rest of the arms of Germany and SS troops during the Second World War. After all, the Wehrmacht and the SS are constantly confused, but these are completely different organizations and departments! These are two completely different structures with different bosses, principles of manning, form and even military greetings. In the Wehrmacht, according to the charter, the Herr was respectfully treated, and in the SS simply "comrade", comrade (rus). Moreover, inside the SS troops there were "SS troops" who created the lion's share of those horrendous crimes for which the entire SS was unequivocally recognized as a "criminal organization" at the Nuremberg trial. By the way, today's nationalists of the former USSR of all stripes are vainly tearing their noses proudly because of the alleged exploits of their grandfathers and great-grandfathers "in the ranks of the SS". Alas, gentlemen nationalists: Your heroes really served in secondary, second-rate parts of the SS. All the "national SS formations", from the Ukrainian "Galychyna", the Russian "Rhone" and the Albanian "Scanderberg" were not SS troops, but SS troops, and this is a huge difference. Not an elite, but a servant of the elite. And if more precisely, they were troops unsuitable for a real war, but very willingly carried out punitive functions against civilians.

There were, of course, exceptions, where without them. For example, the Estonian SS battalion, who defended the Reichstag before the last man ... But these are trivialities that fall within the bounds of statistical error. In any case, in Tallinn in the ranks of the parades of the "SS veterans", nowadays, not the dead, who honestly fulfilled their soldier's duty, are marching ... In the Estonian capital, not heroes march today, but the murderers and punishers of civilians who fell down and surrendered in time are marching. And the commanders of the present, the German SS declared in their hearts: "Now I understand why they hated us so much," but that was after, when they visited Babi Yar as tourists ... Well, okay, I'll return to our sheep. So, why do I consider the authors of the "Barbarossa" directive to be the culprits for the corruption and decline of military discipline among the Wehrmacht soldiers. Of course, without removing from these soldiers the responsibility for the numerous killings, violence, looting of civilians of the former USSR.

Here everything is simple: Military jurisdiction in the Barbarossa area has brought the crimes committed by German servicemen against civilians from the legal field (Central Fund of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, Fund 40, inventory 10, file 83, sheet 90, Central Intelligence Service of the Russian Federal Security Service) Fund 14, 262, sheets 67-69, Central Intelligence Agency of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation Fund 3, list 8, file 83, sheets 76-77, Central Intelligence Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation Fund 14, list 4, file 589, sheets 194-198, list 8, file 4, sheets 20-22, Central Intelligence Agency of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, Fund 3, list 8, file 11, sheets 14-16, Central Intelligence Agency of the Russian Federation, Fund 8, list 8, file 11, sheets 81-83; Fund 3, inventory 8, case 18,