How $PUSS Compares To Ethereum For Utility 🚀, Don't Miss The Second Point!

INTRODUCTION

Source

Digital currencies can be used to settle transactions or as fuel for decentralized platforms. Today, Ethereum is at the forefront of numerous dApps as a leading blockchain platform since it is endowed with great functionality through its smart contracts. On the other hand, new coins such as Puss Coin are emerging by creating differentiating features or utilities that are suitable for particular markets or sectors.

Ethereum is also popular due to its compatibility with numerous tokens and many decentralized applications, such as DeFi protocols, NFTs, and supply chain applications. The reason for its large-scale use as well as an easily adoptable ecosystem lies in the fact that there is an array of developers who are ready to work on projects with intricate programmability.

Puss Coin, on the other hand, wants to focus on a more defined market which seeks community driven projects and possibly some specific aspects. Bringing the two coins into comparison brings out their strengths, weaknesses and the different purposes for which they were created within the cryptocurrency framework.

• SMART CONTRACT FUNCTIONS

In terms of smart contracts and their applications, Ethereum is unmatched and it is seamless to support decentralized applications on it. Programmable smart contracts allow application developers to produce dApps for several purposes not limited to financial services, gaming and identity verification. Additionally, the said standards and seamlessness across applications is guaranteed by the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).

On the other hand, Puss Coin is still adapting regarding smart contract capabilities. If it concentrates on utility, it would be able to provide certain applications that serve its community or industry. However, it does not have the deep ecosystem and the developers’ community that has been developed around initially Ethereum for years. For that reason, Ethereum will remain the main options of developers who need advanced programmability and scalability of their projects.

In the case of Puss Coin the ability to provide the same smart contract functionalities on the same level as Ethereum may not be possible, however, it may develop simpler and more user oriented solutions for its intended users, taking into account where it will position itself.

• DECENTRALIZED APPLICATION (DAPP) ECOSYSTEM

Among the biggest dApp ecosystems, Ethereum is hosting the hand full of projects fully utilizing its blockchain. Well-known platforms such as Uniswap, OpenSea, and MakerDAO meed their needs on Ethereum and this indicates its practicality in the spheres of DeFi, NFTs and so on. It draws in developers and users thus creating network effects that improve its usability.

Puss Coin can be considered as a new entrant, and therefore it seems to have quite limited, operative or no dApp ecosystem at all. Its practical applicability may be limited to certain self-contained purposes or community based projects instead of competing on various fronts with many more projects across the etherum network.
This renders it as being more suitable for certain kinds of applications rather than for mass utilization.

Source

However, Puss Coin also participated in niche markets since there are usually applications that appeal to those niche markets. Nonetheless Puss Coin would have to deal with other usage instances of this coin and for users who are looking forward to ready dApps and rich eco system, Ethereum still comes first.

• TRANSACTION COSTS AND PROCESSING TIME

One of the biggest issues that Ethereum faces is the high fees for transacting as is the case during peak hours. Gas fees on Ethereum can become extremely high above the reach of ordinary transactions. Although said problems are expected to be addressed with Ethereum 2.0 and layer-2 solutions, they do remain a sore point for users.

Depending on the blockchain design, Puss Coin could make the target audience enjoy the benefits of lower payouts and quicker transactions which would be preferred by micro-transactions and other casual users. Coins devised for particular niches tend to focus on ease and cost of the coins which helps in adoption.

However, while lowering the prices look easy, it may harm disproportionality and security which are the strengths of Ethereum owing to the strong network com setup.

• COMMUNITY AND ADOPTION

Perhaps the biggest asset that Ethereum has is its internationally distributed community of developers, businesses and users. It has numerous applications due to its wide-reaching integration across different business models. Also this community is a source of constant improvement, which allows Ethereum to keep up with the advancements of blockchain technology.

The use cases of Puss Coin are expected to depend a lot on the community that it develops and brings on board. If it does manage to get some, there are chances of them being frequent users of Puss Coin but only where Puss is marketing its specific targets. However, when placing Puss in comparison to , such wide adoption across the board is not easy for any new crypto currency to achieve.

In contrast towards Ethereum which is designed for different widespread use cases, Puss Coin seems to focus on building a close community with specific applications from which it derives its strength. Its success will depend on how well it positions itself in the market and offers value to them.

CONCLUSION

Source

Ethereum and Puss Coin have totally different utility in the crypto space, with Puss Coin being more specialized. At the same time, Puss Coin is able to expand towards specific things, niche markets or work on community projects. Quite simply, the decision between both comes down to requirements, be it the multifunctional use and popularity of Ethereum or the specific and possibly cheap usage of Puss Coin. Both have roles to play in the rapidly evolving blockchain space.