Snowpiercer: A Rave Review

in #bechdelcontest6 years ago (edited)

Snow covered mountains 2 in_Ghazni public us employee.jpg

"Snowpiercer" is a brilliant, perfectly structured film. Except for a few bits at the beginning and end, all the action takes place on a train. The pace is fast moving, and yet the movie is profoundly thoughtful. As I re-watched scenes in order to write this review, the flawless efficiency of the dialogue struck me. Every utterance has significance and advances the plot.

The genius of the film is that viewers can ignore all of the craft, brilliant as it is, and still get an edge-of-the-seat ride.

Qualifying criteria for this movie review are the various elements in the Bechdel Test (https://bechdeltest.com/). "Snowpiercer" meets that standard, and goes beyond. Two major roles are played by outstanding actresses: Tilda Swinton, as Mason, and Octavia Spencer, as Tanya. Mason represents the train administration. Tanya represents forces that rebel against the administration. Mason caricatures a stereotypical bureaucrat. Tanya struggles against the cruel indifference of the bureaucracy, which has taken her son, Tim (played by Marcanthonee Reis).

Mason and Tanya confront each other in battle. Tanya slashes her way through defenders of the administration and Mason orders these defenders to kill the rebels. Tanya and Mason speak to one another in the movie, but speech is almost extraneous to action. At one point, when Mason has been subdued by the rebels, Octavia confronts her and demands to know where Tim is. Mason claims she has no information, and tries to lay responsibility with Wilford, the engineer and creator of the train. In another scene, which takes place in the train's sushi bar (!) Mason describes the logic of the train's design and Tanya, regarding Mason with disdain, speaks to her contemptuously.

There are other, important roles for women in the movie. Alison Pill (a teacher, not named) gives a glorious, parodic interpretation of a cult follower, as she instructs a class of young children. And Ko Asung portrays Yona, a young girl who is a drug addict, and who has the gift of second sight.

None of the women in the movie talk about men, unless it's about killing them, or following them into battle. And all of the women satisfy my own, fourth rule (added to Bechdel's): they're not objectified because of their gender.

When I was considering movies that might fit the bill for this contest, I briefly thought of "Alien". The lead in that movie, Ripley, is played brilliantly by Sigourney Weaver. But Weaver never would have been cast to play Ripley if she'd been thirty-five pounds heavier and ten years older. The camera lingers on her body, almost caresses it, when she undresses. The scene is akin to a striptease. This is not something the viewer would see if a male had been cast in the role.

Nothing in "Snowpiercer" resembles a tease. Swinton's physical appearance mirrors the grotesque behavior of her character. Her teeth stick out, her nose is misshapen, her hair is fashioned in a dull-colored, homely style. Octavia Spencer is dressed in rags. Her eye is swollen. Filth is smeared on her face. And, although Alison Pill is beauteous, her shimmery attractiveness is used for contrast, for parody. She looks and acts ridiculous. She is dressed prudishly, sings shrilly and pats her swollen belly to emphasize pregnancy.

The young girl, Yona, is essentially sexless. She's childlike. There is an exaggerated focus on her large eyes. She wears clothing that conceals the shape of her body. For much of the time she's lost in a large coat.

Stop reading here if you don't want to know how the movie ends.

Because this is a perfectly structured film, the end of the story is ordained at the beginning. We are given the history of the train in the first frame: The world is frozen and all people on earth have died, except for those who are on the train. The train is called the "Rattling Ark". The religious symbolism of this term is reinforced verbally and physically throughout the movie.

noah leaving the ark 1663 Adam_de_Colone23 public.jpg

As a result of the rebellion, everyone on the Rattling Ark ultimately perishes, except for two people. The train is overwhelmed by an inundation, not of water but of snow--frozen water. The two survivors are Tim and Yona. This pair, male and female, exit from the train holding hands. The first thing they see is a polar bear, which suggests life is possible.

polar bear public domain.jpg

It is in these two children, we are led to believe, that the future of the human race resides. As Joon-ho Bong, director/writer, explains, "Those two kids will spread the human race". Refer to his interview in "Vulture": http://www.vulture.com/2014/07/snowpiecer-movie-discussion.html

There is so much in this film to please viewers. I haven't touched on much of it. The movie is constructed like a fantastic puzzle where each piece plays a crucial role. The effect of this mosaic is visually and intellectually satisfying. But viewers don't have to think about any of that to enjoy themselves. " Snowpiercer" is, at its heart, an entertaining film. Just sit back and let its magic work.

All of the images were uploaded from Wikimedia Commons and are in the public domain.

Sort:  

First off--I haven’t seen this movie and now I want to. You have an awesome writing style and clear, thoughtful ideas about the movie. Your layout already looks lovely despite being brand new. With content like this as your starting point, I think you’ll go far here! <3 Thank you so much for submitting.

Big smile on my face, right now :) Thank you

Not a bad write up. Did you find any insight or hidden depth while watching? (Upvoted and followed!)

Oh my heavens, don't get me started. I could go frame by frame with the hidden gems. A couple that come to mind: Gilliam (John Hurt) mentions significantly, near the beginning of the film, that nobody is what they appear to be; Mason (Swinton) in giving her "shoe" speech, mimes the motion children have to perform in order to keep the engine going; Gilliam, (again), after the bloody battle in the corridor tells the rebels to clean themselves, to wash the blood off--as one would do in a religious ritual. Treasure throughout, and this without touching on political themes, critique of religion and wounds that humans inflict upon the earth. Insight? Great art doesn't give answers, it raises questions and asks us to think. Thanks for the compliment. I'm following you, also.

Good eye for details. Without leading you, I was curious to know if you hinted any gnostic themes. 'Cause if you turn that train 90 degrees...

I don't know much about gnosticism. Every time I hear the term gnostic, I think of Borges--not even sure why.

If you type 'snowpiercer gnostic' into google, you'll get a whole bunch of articles theorizing on that angle. This is the one I remember reading right after I watched it a few years back:

https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-an-obscure-2nd-century-christian-heresy-influenced-1609994487

Thanks--I will :)

I read the piece. Interesting. My take on the film is more secular, and after reading Joon-ho Bong's interview with Vulture Magazine http://www.vulture.com/2014/07/snowpiecer-movie-discussion.html, I feel more confident about the view. I think it's about tyranny--not just political tyranny, but social and religious tyranny. The people on the train were trapped in a closed system. As long as they accepted the rules of the system, they were doomed. It was only when they rebelled, that freedom and survival were possible. My humble opinion.

Oh, yeah, I'm not saying there's only one interpretation, obviously. And if the director didn't intend the gnostic allegory, I find it even more interesting that he may have stumbled into it accidentally.

Excellent review! I agree with @lilyraab - you do this well!

Thank you!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 63478.09
ETH 3067.28
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.81